I can’t argue with any of the points your making, since I don’t know anything about Dave’s service. I’m actually always interested in seeing what services like his have to offer when I read about them, and I would be delighted to take a look at what he has to offer. Unfortunately, I personally can’t afford the cost of the service to be able to take a look for myself. As such, the review on John’s blog didn’t have an effect on me personally since I couldn’t afford the service regardless.

If what you state is true, I can’t argue about the professionalism of the particular post. I can only say that I have found his content to be meaningful during the timespan that I have been reading his blog and that he does offer quality advice on the topic of making money online. All things considered, I find that it is a good resource that I read daily.

When someone orders a review through ReviewMe or a similar service, it is not guaranteed that the person performing the review will be in a positive light. Many people will write these reviews positively regardless because they don’t want to close the doors on future opportunities. However, John Chow has such a big reputation that writing a negative review is unlikely to hurt his chances at receiving future requests.

As such, I personally found myself appreciating the negative review of Super Apprentice in that it shows John Chow isn’t simply accepting every review opportunity to boast random products and services to simply maximize his earnings. Whether or not the opinions of the review accurately reflect the majority of his readers who have/would have used Super Apprentice cannot be known.

Regardless, given that JohnChow.com is a personal blog where he (and other bloggers he invites) blogs his own opinions during reviews, I don’t see how you can argue whether or not his content can be considered honest.